Recursive route mikrotik v7 not working. Re: Recursive routing working in 7.

Recursive route mikrotik v7 not working. /ip route add distance=251 gateway=198. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. 1 and 8. Thanks, Tony S Does RouterOS do some lazy evaluation on wether a host is online and since it was unable to ping 1. 1 routing-table=rtab-2 The route rule works under ROS v6. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for Recursive routing working in 7. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Re: Recursive routing working in 7. The first route is unreachable because we have not told it it can use other routes to look up the gateway address, they way it does this is through the scope and target scope metrics. Quote #1 Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:54 pm I have not used recursive routing since moving to 7. #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRouting Failover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:13 pm anav wrote: ↑ Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:44 pm Yes, why would you use their ref material LOL. The route form: Re: Recursive routing working in 7. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for While RR can work with ECMP, netwatch disabling a route just more clear than all RIB/FIB/“next-hop” stuff (and icmp check in netwatch more rich with stuff like latency as a metric which is not possible recursive routes). The first implementation of routing filters in ROSv7 was difficult Re: Recursive routing working in 7. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all Feature Status N/A - Feature not yet available OK - Initial tests successful NOK - initial tests not successful Highlight Colors: Yellow - partially working Green - Working Red - Not working at the moment From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Re: ros v7 beta4 recursive route by CZFan » Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:31 pm Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Selain distance dan In OP example they are not the same, what is intended is to try to install forwarding path over ether1 twice and through ether2 once, leading to forwarding where ether1 is chosen twice as much as ether2. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so how must the recursive route decide which route to use? that works no more in rOS V7 First two rules to route 1. Hi, I saw it reported elsewhere that recursive routes and gateway tracking don't work in RoS 7. 47. 4) if: update from sub task is received; protocol has The distance on the default route (i. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for #Recursive_Route #MTCRE #RouterOSv7In this video, I will show you how to configure recursive route on MikroTik RouterOS v7 using the scope and target scope a Unlock the potential of Recursive next-hop and scope/target-scope usage on MikroTik RouterOS for smarter and more effective network routing. 113. I simulated broken internet, I pulled out coaxial cable from border router (ISP1) not direct UTP cable betvine ISP1 and my MT. You will need some kind of route monitoring or checks to know when some route is down and disabling it so your clients connections don't fail miserably. Recursive routing working in 7. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more . all nets with the getaway set with same public address is invalid - red color !? Recursive routing working in 7. e. 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. But I don’t get the “official way” (and it also doesn’t work, just like for you). 1 recursive routes v7. 13. 1 second two rules for ping-checking with dummy gw 10. So, clients that prefer ISP-1 go My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 8. (this solution works imidietly) It come from official mikrotik documentation website and it’s not working. 6? Quote #1 Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:54 pm I have not used recursive routing since moving to 7. Overview Routing filters have been a hot topic lately in the world of RouterOSv7. xx and does not work with ROS v7. I use the values to determine which recursive route is currently active/ default, then make some changes elsewhere in the router. 168. Which is working on RouterOS6. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. So, maybe there is a better way to go about this? Anyone know the Simple WAN failover with MikroTik 04 Jan 2024 MikroTik offers many options when discussing Internet high availability, ISP redundancy, Mikrotik Tutorial - Dual Wan Recursive Failover in Mikrotik ROS 7 | Mikrotik Configuration Tutorial Step by StepLearn how to setup Dual Wan Recursive Failove Hi, I saw it reported elsewhere that recursive routes and gateway tracking don’t work in RoS 7. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 1 & 4. If the Unfortunately with the two ECMP default gateways rules I get invalid and unreachable. Overview Policy routing is the method to steer traffic matching certain criteria to a certain gateway. dst-address=0. Thanks again, I can now be fairly confident that if the recursive route isn't reachable the router will failover from WAN to the other. 17. (this solution works imidietly) Hi everbody! Reading a lot these days, learning some new things but cannot practice too much because of angry wife when Internet is not working at home! 😆 I think I achieved a satisfactory stage, PBR is working fine. Re: Recursive routing working in 7. 1 routing-table=rtab-1 /ip route add gateway=203. Does that other page explain why the page about recursive routes doesn’t work? Wrong question. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more I’ve no idea if you’re setup correctly as mine looks different to yours. the first route lookup for a Internet address (0. V6. (this solution works imidietly) My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. It is important to select a target that is very reliable, because when the target does not answer pings, the route will be marked as unavailable. 2. Today we will be looking at what Recursive routing is, what Route Scopes allow us to achieve and how to implement Recursive routing for failover purposes on a MikroTik device with multiple WAN From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. I can't get how the check-gateway not working with Ping for PPPoE interfaces on RouterOS7. i. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm The distance on the default route (i. After upgrading to RouterOS7, the Route rules with mark routing go unreachable which is using Ping in Check-gateway. Is this still an issue? A… Routing Protocol Overview Feature Status Performance Status One Peer Receive Only Two Peers Receive Only Multi-homing Sim Memory Usage: Feature Status N/A - Feature not yet available OK - Initial tests successful NOK - initial tests not successful Highlight Colors: Yellow - partially working Green - Working Red - Not working at the moment Routing Table Update Mechanism Illustration below tries to explain in more user friendly form on how routing table update mechanism is working. We do Recursive routing working in 7. 1 /ip route add distance=252 gateway=203. X. . It can even be used to steer local and overseas traffic to different gateways. I tried using this page as a template to get started The distance on the default route (i. If I disconnect ethernet cable or cut power of one of the ISPs equipment at home, the other handles all traffic. My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Routes are processed in scope order, and updates to routes with a larger scope cannot affect the state of nexthop lookup for routes with a smaller scope. This can be used to force some customers or specific protocols from the servers (for example HTTP traffic) to always be routed to a certain gateway. RouterOS implements several components My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for Re: Recursive routing working in 7. Works well under ROS v6, but is no longer compatible with ROS v7. The target scope tells the route that if any other route has a scope that is less than the this it will be able to use it for a lookup. But, v7 software routing is not complete and recursive does not work yet - as far as I’m aware. 8 for the recursive routes via ether1, now it automatically assumes that those 2 DNS servers are offline? So that means that it Recursive routing working in 7. If the primary network fails My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 2, from my laptop on the network using the forward chain. I tried using this page as a template to get started Recursive routing working in 7. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all I have successfully tested the drop filter rule on both recursive routes, 1. 51. 1. x, and I can see a thread here where someone is having the same issue with no actual fix reported. 100. 10 I believe. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. e. The recursive route is set using the The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. There are changes in RouterOS v7 nexthop lookup. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more Whether you're a networking professional or just starting your journey, we provide easy-to-follow tutorials, tips, and tricks to help you master MikroTik routers and networking solutions. 4. g. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for I’ve been using the following script snippet to get the status of Recursive Routes in a MultiWAN setting. I’m on long term. This is not going to work in v7, because, like I said previously, equal gateways are installed in the FIB only once. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 0/0) makes it failover (different distance) or ECMP (same distance for 0. The distance on the default route (i. 0. xx? My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. All I see is in red “invalid” or “unreachable”: v7. The solution is to use a recursive route. 200. Untuk itu ada sebuah trik pada pengaturan routing untuk membuat fail over secara otomatis tanpa menggunakan script. This is important to note when upgrading from ROSv6 to v7 as those rules will no longer work The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. Is this still an issue? At the moment I rely on this feature on my RB4011 to fail over between ADSL on a Zyxel router, and LTE on a Mikrotik SXT. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRoutingFailover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. The recursive route uses a remote target to validate the entire path. RouterOS 6 working example configuration ROSv6 does not enforce the rules related to scope and target-scope for rules that use recursive lookups. 1 /ip route add gateway=198. Because: it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that’s equal, definitely not larger); it works in the following case: dst:host, gw:connected_gateway, scope=11, target-scope=10 dst:subnet, From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. A popular target is the Google DNS server 8. When I switch it to BFD it works. If its not working, then I need to fix the documentation. 1 recursive routes Failover (WAN Backup) and RouterOS 7 WAN Failover guide didn't work Routed Multi-WAN without NAT Primary gateway with static ip address not activating Summary of changes in behavior between ROSv6 and ROSv7 wizkid77 October 28, 2021, 6:03pm 2 From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. 4 to real router 192. Routing protocols continuously loop through following procedures: " main " process waits for updates from other sub tasks (1); " main " starts to calculate new routes (2. 1 to be used as default route on fifth route What to do ? Thank you anav March 19, 2023, 8:46pm 2 A simple question, what is the best way to failover in RouterOS v7, recursive route or netwatch with script? Why? It's working fine on RouterOS6. From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. Hi guys, how can i configure recursive route for failover ? Directly connected route rule to public address is active (with scope 10), but the second route rule with dst. Have you ever figured out what was wrong? I’m facing similar issues, and I fully understand the way you set it up - this is the exact way The Network Berg showed in his video. 0/0 routes) - but distance does not effect how recursive routes work. tvxe svow ckgc nqb faxxp uyesz oqv xtgyhjr hreva uegfj